The MPLS WG Archive

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

> Yep. And I beleiev Last call ends on 9th of Sept, right?

	Alex can confirm, but I think you are right.

	--Tom



> 
> Thanks,
> Bert 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas D. Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com]
> > Sent: dinsdag 2 september 2003 18:25
> > To: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; 'Mpls (E-mail)'
> > Cc: mail@stefan-winter.de
> > Subject: RE: error in draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-12.txt
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 	Yes, I caught this one just after I published
> > the TE MIB, and thought that I could re-publish
> > immediately version 12. Apparently the repository
> > ignored my second posting. Is the process now to
> > re-issue a new revision with this fixed post
> > the last call period?
> > 
> > 	--Tom
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET] On Behalf
> > > Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:43 PM
> > > To: Mpls (E-mail)
> > > Cc: mail@stefan-winter.de
> > > Subject: FW: error in draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-12.txt
> > > 
> > > 
> > > MPLS TE MIB authors... a comment that came back from
> > > IETF Last Call
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bert
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stefan Winter [mailto:	
> > > Sent: donderdag 28 augustus 2003 11:00
> > > To: iesg@ietf.org
> > > Subject: error in draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-12.txt
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > there is a clash in the DESCRIPTION clause of the MIB
> > > definition of the two 
> > > entities
> > > 
> > > mplsTunnelHopPathOptionIndex (mplsTunnelHopEntry 2) and
> > > mplsTunnelHopIndex (mplsTunnelHopEntry 3)
> > > 
> > > Both are described as "secondary index into this table", but
> > > mplsTunnelHopIndex is actually the "tertiary index into this 
> > > table". This should be corrected bfore releasing this draft as PS.
> > > 
> > > Greetings,
> > > 
> > > Stefan Winter
> > > 
> > 
>