The MPLS WG Archive

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

	Yes, I caught this one just after I published
the TE MIB, and thought that I could re-publish
immediately version 12. Apparently the repository
ignored my second posting. Is the process now to
re-issue a new revision with this fixed post 
the last call period?

	--Tom



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET] On Behalf 
> Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:43 PM
> To: Mpls (E-mail)
> Cc: mail@stefan-winter.de
> Subject: FW: error in draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-12.txt
> 
> 
> MPLS TE MIB authors... a comment that came back from 
> IETF Last Call
> 
> Thanks,
> Bert 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Winter [mailto:	
> Sent: donderdag 28 augustus 2003 11:00
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: error in draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-12.txt
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> there is a clash in the DESCRIPTION clause of the MIB 
> definition of the two 
> entities
> 
> mplsTunnelHopPathOptionIndex (mplsTunnelHopEntry 2) and 
> mplsTunnelHopIndex (mplsTunnelHopEntry 3)
> 
> Both are described as "secondary index into this table", but 
> mplsTunnelHopIndex is actually the "tertiary index into this 
> table". This should be corrected bfore releasing this draft as PS.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Stefan Winter
>