The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Nov> msg00147



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

About the P2MP scalability

  • From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:35:11 -0000
  • Cc: "'mpls@uu.net'" <mpls@UU.NET>

Hi Melvin,

Thanks for both of your emails on this subject.

> Sir, I have several questions to ask:
> 1) how can we implement the P2MP in the non-packet network?
> 2) can we have some method to solve the scalability problem in P2MP
>     implementation?
> 3) Can we not to put the PE1 from the sender node in the edge-node,
>      but in the inner node in the mpls domain? I think it could enhance
>      the scalability. Although I know we always put these functions on
>      the edge node.
>
>  Hope your reply.

It is the intention of draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-requirement-01.txt to make sure that any
p2mp solution developed in the MPLS WG should be applicable to other switching types (i.e.
non-packet).

Scalability is, of course, a significant concern.
draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-requirement-01.txt describes networks where the branch points are
within the network and not at the edges. Scaling issues are mentioned at many points in
the draft.

There are currently two proposed solutions drafts (it is to be hoped that these may
converge on a single solution over time). Both proposed solutions take some pains to
ensure optimal use of network resources. Both solutions currently have some scaling issues
within the control plane, but I'm sure the authors are working to resolve these issues.

Cheers,
Adrian