The MPLS WG Archive

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> 
> Bert,
>    Thanks for the pointer.  It looks like something relevant for our
> use.
> Would there be any problems to extend it for 5 minute intervals?

I think it would not be good to add to that existing doc, cause it
is already at DS and so it would have to recycle at PS.

But..

You/one/we could do a separate set of TCs for 5 minute intervals
Or we could generalize it so that intervals are variable (e.g.
need to be configured)... or ...

Is it something that is needed in many places?
Maybe something to discuss on mibs mailing list.

Bert

> Thanks, Wai Sum
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:23 PM
> To: Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALABS; jcucchiara@mindspring.com
> Cc: mpls@UU.NET; Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Chung, Li-Jin W, ALABS
> Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-lai-mpls-ldp-hist-mib-00.txt
> 
> 
> > ....  The draft currently proposes five additional
> > objects, while the issue of measurement interval and 
> > recording counters to maintain persistent history has
> > been left open for further discussion.
> 
> Are you aware of RFC3593 ??
> Is that something that might be usable here?
> 
> Bert
>