The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Last call : draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-restart-applic-00.txt
It shouldn't be necessary (since this has already been discussed), but for the record, I reiterate supporting the current contents of this draft. Thanks, Andy -----Original Message----- From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.se] Sent: Tue 5/6/2003 5:08 PM To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) Cc: Adrian Farrel; 'mpls@uu.net'; George Swallow; zinin@psg.com Subject: Re: Last call : draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-restart-applic-00.txt All, I beg to differ - normally at least I keep quite if I don't have any comments, so I regard "no comments" as good news. However since our AD has this opinion I would like to invite also positive comments and support. I recall that I did so once before, (and at that time got good suport) but never mind... Show your habd once more. /Loa Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: > I assume many people will already know that "we did NOT see ANY comments" > is in my view BAD news. We would like people to express that they > read the doc, understood it and find it good and usefull stuff. > > Silence might also mean "nobody gives a shoot" and so that in my view > then translates in "we're wasting cycles, bits, paper... etc" > > Sorry for my rant. > Bert > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:afarrel@movaz.com] >>Sent: maandag 28 april 2003 15:06 >>To: 'mpls@uu.net' >>Cc: George Swallow; Loa Andersson; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); zinin@psg.com >>Subject: Last call : draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-restart-applic-00.txt >> >> >>Hi, >>I didn't see any comments on this draft during the last call >>period. Can we move >>it along now please? >> >>Thanks, >>Adrian >> >> >>>This message begins an MPLS Workgroup last call on >>> >>> Applicability Statement for Restart Mechanisms for LDP >>> draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-restart-applic-00.txt >>> >>>The last call closes 4/14 24:00 GMT. >>> >>>...George >> >> >> > > -- /Loa mobile + 46 739 81 21 64 email: loa@pi.se |
|