The MPLS WG Archive

[bhaskarap@mail.com]

Hi Jean,

The draft-vasseur-mpls-computation-rsvp-03.txt suggests overload RSVP message to query path request/response between
path server and client.  Why RSVP should be overloaded when
it does not involve RSVP signalling.  Why can't we use some plain client-server model instead of overloading RSVP in a scenario which is not related to RSVP.  I came across one
more draft-lee-mpls-path-request-04.txt which is just a plain client-server model. 

Can you please clarify issues involving these two methods.

I do see draft-kompella-mpls-multiarea-te-03.txt expired.  What is the status of this draft? Does any one have idea regarding the implementions for multi-area TE/CSPF among vendors?

Can any one clarify?

thank you
bhaskara
----- Original Message -----
From: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:11:12 -0800
To: "Bhaskara Peela" <bhaskarap@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Inter-area cspf

> Hi,
> 
> FYI, if you're interested by multi-area TE, you might want to consider:
> - http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kompella-mpls-multiarea-te-03.txt
> For PCS-PCC signalling (scenarios 2,4 and 5 on of the previous draft) see:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vasseur-mpls-computation-rsvp-03.txt
> 
> JP.
> 
> At 15:06 18/03/2003 -0500, Bhaskara Peela wrote:
> >[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
> >   and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
> >   post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
> >   message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
> >   address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
> >   automatically accepted. ]
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Can any one update me about the status of following drafts
> >
> >1)draft-ash-ccamp-multi-area-te-reqmts-00.txt
> >2)draft-lee-mpls-te-exchange-00.txt
> >3)draft-lee-mpls-path-request-00.txt
> >4)draft-cheng-ccamp-ospf-multiarea-te-extensions-01.txt
> >
> >I would like to know what is the latest ongoing standadization process for 
> >inter-area OSPF-TE LSA flooding
> >for CSPF calculation for GMPLS or MPLS.
> >
> >thank you
> >bhaskara
> >--
> >__________________________________________________________
> >Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
> >http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
> 

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup