The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Inter-area cspf
Hi, Mailing list archive points me to the following message regarding inter/multi area CSPF by Yokov. > -----Original Message----- > From: Yakov Rekhter [mailto:yakov@juniper.net] > Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 6:29 AM > To: srisuresh@yahoo.com > Cc: ietf@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Last Call: Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF Version 2 > to Proposed Standard > > > Suresh, > > > > > My recommendation against using this draft as the basis for > > > > building further TE-extensions to inter-area and mixed networks > > > > was in the context of OSPF Autonomous System (AS). I also > > > > mentioned the draft has scalability limitations in extending this > > > > to inter-area and mixed networks - also in the context of OSPF AS. > > > > > > > > Without going into the details of the "Multi-area MPLS Traffic > > > > Enginering" draft - The work cited in this draft as going on to > > > > address multi-area TE is in the MPLS signalling context, not in > > > > the OSPF. > > > > > > As I said in my previous e-mail quite a few scenarios described in > > > draft-kompella-mpls-multiarea-te-03.txt are supported with the TE > > > extensions that are subject to this Last Call. That is precisely > > > while quite a few scenarios in the "Multi-area MPLS Traffic > Engineering" > > > draft do not require any additions to what is already defined > > > in the katz-yeung draft. > > > > > > Yakov. > > Does this mean to suggest inter-area constraint based path computation should follow ideas presented in draft-kompella-mpls-multiarea-te-03.txt and draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-09.txt ? Or is there any active alternate process going on. Can any one update this issue. thank you bhaskara -----Original Message----- From: Bhaskara Peela [mailto:bhaskarap@mail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:06 PM To: mpls@uu.net Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org Subject: Inter-area cspf [ post by non-subscriber. with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers. if you wish to regularly post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are automatically accepted. ] Hi, Can any one update me about the status of following drafts 1)draft-ash-ccamp-multi-area-te-reqmts-00.txt 2)draft-lee-mpls-te-exchange-00.txt 3)draft-lee-mpls-path-request-00.txt 4)draft-cheng-ccamp-ospf-multiarea-te-extensions-01.txt I would like to know what is the latest ongoing standadization process for inter-area OSPF-TE LSA flooding for CSPF calculation for GMPLS or MPLS. thank you bhaskara -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
|
|