The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Mar> msg00244



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Between OSPF RSVP...

  • From: Yangguang Xu <xuyg@lucent.com>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:36:56 -0500
  • CC: Steve Yao <syao@chiaro.com>, mpls <mpls@UU.NET>
  • Organization: Lucent Technologies, Inc.


You were talking about implementation with linked list to each port to speed up
traversing. His point is, I think, the failure can happen any port/link in the
network, construct data structure according to the HE local ports may not
helpful in some cases. 

Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> 
> In message <F69EB380D594D611BBEA00065B3F14B4A35250@MAIL>, Steve Yao writes:
> >
> >
> > >Then the path-tear and/or the directed notify would still notify the
> > >ingress.
> > >
> > >What circumstances are you thinking of.
> > >
> > >Curtis
> > >
> >
> > I guess it is suffice to say that the linked list mechanism does not cover
> > all the cases.
> >
> > Steve
> 
> It wasn't intended to cover all cases and does not depricate use of
> path-tear.  You still didn't answer my question.
> 
> Curtis