The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
David, What Kireeti and Curtis said, and to make things worse, I for one review the documents that try to make their front page more convincing than their substance with additional scrutiny... -- Alex Tuesday, March 4, 2003, 1:54:24 PM, David Allan wrote: > Alex: > You are offering a compelling argument to eliminate crediting of any authors > on I-Ds etc. We can claim that there is no weight in a consensus based > organization, while we struggle to eliminate the practice of 20 plus authors > on a draft. > I would assume I'm not the only one to note this inconsistency. > Cheers > Dave > <snipped> >> >>Bingo! >> >>It seems to me that this is the only way to ensure fairness in the IETF, > actually. Once >>we start introducing any sorts of preferences or "weights", it may become a > too >>attractive backdoor around the IETF process. >>Also, what does "weight" of a liaison or an ID really mean in a _consensus_ > based >>organization? That we should suddenly have a worm and fuzzy feeling about > that doc? And >>how does this "weight" compare to, for example, the weight of the consensus > within the >>IETF to not do what's proposed, if that happens?
|
|