The MPLS WG Archive

[Edward Harrison <eph@dataconnection.com>]

Hi,

One thing I immediately notice in draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-10.txt is that the
mplsTunnelEntry still includes an mplsTunnelExcludeAllAffinity object as
opposed to an mplsTunnelExcludeAnyAffinity (which is what is used in RFC
3209).

Each time I've raised this in the past it has been agreed (by Tom at the
very least) that the object should be "Exclude-any", but the mark-up keeps
getting lost by the time the next version appears.

Any chance of fixing it before the draft goes to RFC?

Regards,

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.se]
Sent: 25 June 2003 00:28
To: MPLS WG
Cc: George Swallow; Bert Wijnen; Alex Zinin
Subject: WG last call on the FTN mib module and the TE mib module


All,

this mail starts a working group last call on

       Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering
                   Management Information Base

                 <draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-10.txt>

This ID has just been sent to the Internet-Drafts for publication and
will show up shortly, in the mean time it will be found at:

http://urax.utfors.net/~loa/draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-10.txt

This mail also the starts a working group last call on

        Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Forwarding Equivalence
          Class To Next Hop Label Forwarding Entry (FEC-To-NHLFE)
                        Management Information Base

                      draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt

for this mib module the wg last call is limited to the changes since the
previous version version

This ID has just been sent to the Internet-Drafts for publication and
will show up shortly, in the mean time it will be found at:

http://urax.utfors.net/~loa/draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt

The last call will en June 29th 09.00 ET.

-- 
/Loa

mobile + 46 739 81 21 64
email: loa@pi.se