The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] prequeal to WG lat call om the LSR mib module[mplsInSegmentTable]
As a provider of management solutions... We'd "prefer" to have a simple solution but we MUST have a working solution. Although the proposed change makes the instancing a bit more complex, the getnext performance of the current mplsXCTable is so slow that its practically unreadable in any reasonably sized network. Mike Shevenell Aprisma Management Technologies -----Original Message----- From: Thomas D. Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:35 AM To: 'Choudhury, Sanjaya'; mpls@UU.NET Subject: RE: prequeal to WG lat call om the LSR mib module[mplsInSegmentTable] > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET] On Behalf > Of Choudhury, Sanjaya > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:06 PM > To: 'mpls@UU.NET' > Subject: RE: prequeal to WG lat call om the LSR mib > module[mplsInSegmentTable] > > > Hi! Few comments in-line regarding the indexing of the > mplsInSegmentTable > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas D. Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com] > > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 9:13 AM > > To: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; 'MPLS WG' > > Subject: RE: prequeal to WG lat call om the LSR mib module > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET] On Behalf > > > Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > > > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:14 AM > > > To: MPLS WG > > > Subject: RE: prequeal to WG lat call om the LSR mib module > > > > > > <snip...> > > stuff deleted... The problem with designing in the ideal is that real implementations will have issues with it. The IETF generally considers implementation and deployment experience highly over the ideal. I have provided some real world feedback that indicates that a single Unsigned32 index is insufficient. I also have about 300 customers that have provided me with the same feedback. I think that it has little to do with my specific style of implementation either (see below). more stuff deleted.. --Tom
|
|