The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE:
> I have some questions on RFC 3031, MPLS Architecture. > > Section 3.12 says > "If the FTN maps a particular label to a set of NHLFEs that > contains > more than one element, exactly one element of the set must be > chosen > before the packet is forwarded. The procedures for choosing > an > element from the set are beyond the scope of this > document.Having > the FTN map a label to a set containing more than one NHLFE > may be > useful if, e.g., it is desired to do load balancing over > multiple > equal-cost paths." > > > 1. Here actually we should be talking about the FEC to NHLFE > mapping rather than Label to NHLFE mapping. Isn't that correct? FTN = FEC to NHLFE ILM = Incoming Label Map (Label to NHLFE) Yes, you are correct > 2. Have these procedures to identify one of the multiple entries > been defined as of now? If yes, wonder if I could get some > pointers for them. No, nothing has been standardised (atleast I'm not aware). This where vendor value add comes in. > 3. Are there other scenarios also wherein it's useful to map an > FEC to multiple NHLFEs? Fast re-route/ backup LSPs. Specialized handling where one may want to send packets belonging to a special category (incoming i/f, src IP, dest port or other such information) on a special LSP i.e. the FEC is now more than just the dest IP, it is augmented with more information. Cheers -- Sumit Garg
|
|