The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Jul> msg00113



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Question on BGP/MPLS VPN rfc2547bis

  • From: "Jim Guichard" <jguichar@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:20:02 -0400
  • Importance: Normal

yes, although you would need to check your specific vendor implementation to
make sure it covers such a configuration. Jim

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of Arumugam
> >V
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 12:32 AM
> >To: mpls@UU.NET
> >Subject: Question on BGP/MPLS VPN rfc2547bis
> >
> >
> >Hello,
> >I have a question. Can someone help me to get the clarification?
> >Can IP address of CE routers, over which they establish BGP
> >session with PE,
> >overlap?
> >Means two CEs, say CE1 (in VPN A) and CE2 (in VPN B), having same IP
> >addresses, can have BGP session to same PE.
> >Here I am not talking about VPN routes, I am only talking about
> >CE router's
> >IP address. Having same IP addresses may lead to lots of
> >complication in the
> >implementation.
> >I would appreciate if you give justification with the answer.
> >Thanks and Regards,
> >Arumugam
> >
> >*****************************************************************
> >**********
> >This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL)
> >and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> >is addressed. It may contain  privileged or confidential information
> >and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for
> >what it is intended.
> >
> >If you have received this message in error, please notify the
> >originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient,
> >you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using,
> >copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message.
> >FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from
> >the use of the information transmitted by this email including
> >damage from virus.
> >*****************************************************************
> >**********