The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RSVP Fastreroute
All,
I have a few questions on RSVP fastreroute (draft-ietf
-mpls-rsvp-lsp-fastreroute-03.txt)
Consider the following network,
A---B---C---D---E---G
| | |
|---F-------|
Assume the following
The protected LSP has a ERO (ABCDEG)
1-to-1 backup is being employed.
All nodes are using Sender Template Method of backup
identification
Also,
B creats a backup LSP with ERO (BFEG)
C creats a backup LSP with ERO (CFEG).
If I understand section 7.1.1 (Merging Backup Paths
using the sender template specific method) correctly,
one (and only one) path message will be sent/refreshed
from nodes F to E. The sender template in this path
message will belong to the winner of this merge.
Is this correct ? If so shouldn't the traffic spec of
this final path message reflect the traffic
requirements of the messages that have been merged.
Is this what the authors mean when they say in
paragraph 2 (line # 2)of section 7.1.1,
"Similar to that specified in [RSVP-TE] for merging
of RESV messages,".
So, if fastreroute is not being used, merging
will still occur the way I have described above
(assuming ofcourse that I am correct in the first
place). If not, at a detour merge point how can
I tell the difference between a detour LSP ( no
DETOUR object ) and a regular non-fastrerouteable
LSP i.e one should be merged and one should not.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers,
Gopal
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
|
|