The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Jan> msg00169



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Question on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mib-09.txt

  • From: "Carlos M. Pignataro" <cpignata@cisco.com>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:18:07 -0500

Hi,

In draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mib-09, the mplsLdpAtmSesTable specifies the ATM specific LDP session parameters negotiated. It currently contains the Label Ranges negotiated in the LC-ATM (LR intersection). 

However, there is another ATM specific parameter negotiated which is the Directionality (D, VC Directionality in RFC-3036). The directionality is configured with mplsLdpEntityAtmVcDirectionality in MplsLdpEntityAtmParmsEntry, but can have a different negotiated value than the one configured. Would it make sense to include the directionality negotiated value in the mplsLdpAtmSesTable as a mplsLdpAtmSesVcDirectionality?

Regards,

--Carlos.

=================================================================
                            |  Carlos Pignataro - CCIE 4619
     cisco Systems, Inc.    |  Escalation RTP
                            |  cpignata@cisco.com
       ||         ||        |  +1 919 392 7428 - office
      .||.       .||.       |  +1 919 345 3028 - mobile
     .||||.     .||||.      |  +1 919 392 6470 - fax
  .:||||||||:.:||||||||:.   |  7025 Kit Creek Road, PO Box 14987
      Are you Ready ?       |  Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
=================================================================