The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Jan> msg00104



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

IANA Considerations for RSVP

  • From: Eric Gray <ewgray@GraIyMage.com>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:42:34 -0500
  • CC: David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>, Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, rsvp@ISI.EDU, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET, kireeti@juniper.net, iana@ISI.EDU, sob@harvard.edu, mankin@psg.com, bwijnen@lucent.com
  • X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
  • X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host19.ipowerweb.com
  • X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - uu.net
  • X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0]
  • X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - graiymage.com

Zhi,

    Yours may be an equally unfair characterization.  In general, the reaction
in the IETF to any intended RFC submitted as a 'fait accompli' is similar to
what you are seeing here - regardless of whether it came from an individual
or an organization representative.

"Lin, Zhi-Wei (Zhi)" wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> This seems like an unfair characterization. All requests are submitted by individuals. In terms of changing these protocols...
>

...