The MPLS WG Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

IANA Considerations for RSVP

From: "Lin, Zhi-Wei (Zhi)" <zwlin@lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:52:17 -0500
Cc: David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>, Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, rsvp@ISI.EDU, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET, kireeti@juniper.net, iana@ISI.EDU, sob@harvard.edu, mankin@psg.com, bwijnen@lucent.com

Hi Eric,

Please see Steve's email on the history. After reading that, I hope you would change your mind about the "fait accompli" remark...

Thanks
Zhi


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Gray [mailto:ewgray@graiymage.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:43 PM
To: Lin, Zhi-Wei (Zhi)
Cc: David Charlap; Bob Braden; rsvp@ISI.EDU; ccamp@ops.ietf.org;
mpls@UU.NET; kireeti@juniper.net; iana@ISI.EDU; sob@harvard.edu;
mankin@psg.com; bwijnen@lucent.com
Subject: Re: IANA Considerations for RSVP


Zhi,

    Yours may be an equally unfair characterization.  In general, the reaction
in the IETF to any intended RFC submitted as a 'fait accompli' is similar to
what you are seeing here - regardless of whether it came from an individual
or an organization representative.

"Lin, Zhi-Wei (Zhi)" wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> This seems like an unfair characterization. All requests are submitted by individuals. In terms of changing these protocols...
>

...