The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Jan> msg00098



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

IANA Considerations for RSVP

  • From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:09:35 -0500
  • Cc: David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>, Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, rsvp@ISI.EDU, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET, kireeti@juniper.net, iana@ISI.EDU, sob@harvard.edu, mankin@psg.com, bwijnen@lucent.com
  • Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>,Brian Hassink <BHassink@HatterasNetworks.com>,David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>,Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, rsvp@ISI.EDU, ccamp@ops.ietf.org,mpls@UU.NET, kireeti@juniper.net, iana@ISI.EDU, sob@harvard.edu,mankin@psg.com, bwijnen@lucent.com
  • User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 11:06:53AM -0500, Brian Hassink allegedly wrote:
> Didn't the IETF set the precedent by extending RSVP from an IntServ
> protocol to an MPLS protocol?

Check the documentation.  RSVP is not an intserv protocol.  It's
(potentially) used by intserv.  It's also used for other things.