The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Feb> msg00159



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt

  • From: "Ong, Lyndon" <LyOng@ciena.com>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:31:12 -0800
  • Cc: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET

Hi,

Can I ask a clarifying question regarding liaisons?  The
issue revolves around making extensions to GMPLS.  Is
it the view that such extensions must be generated 
through Internet Drafts, and cannot be through
liaisons?

It sounds like people may be assuming that liaisons are
always providing background information or requesting
information, when on occasion a liaison may be requesting
a change or action.

BTW, regarding responses to liaisons, the A-D may or may
not be the proper source for a response, but the knowledge
for putting together the response would typically reside
within a particular WG, I believe.  One problem is that
you don't have the time within an IETF meeting to assign
a "stuckie" (to use the new term) to write a response ;o)

Cheers,

Lyndon