The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Feb> msg00130



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt

  • From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:09:07 -0800 (PST)
  • cc: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, "" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "" <mpls@UU.NET>

Hi Bert,

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> No of course NOT. Many Liasons will want an answer.
> So we need a process to follow up and to track if a timely
> response has been (or will be) send.

Is the IETF process for replying to liaison statements (and of
generating them) written down, say in some RFC?  If so, could you
send me a pointer?

> But the Liasons communication between ITU and CCAMP/MPLS has not
> been going smoothly so far (even though we had good intentions).
> Responses have not gone out in time (or in some cases at all).

I'll take full responsibility for that.

Thanks,
Kireeti.