The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] draft-meyer-mpls-soft-preemption-00.txt
First, great draft - I like this concept. While a flag might be just the right thing for this particular application, I wonder if it might be good to try to broaden soft preemption technique to include other polite preemptions. These might include the following indicators o) your LSP is being prempted on the indicated link (draft covers) o) your LSP should be rerouted, this node is shutting down o) your LSP should be rerouted, this link is being taken out of service o) your LSP should be rerouted away from this node (administrative/CLI) o) your LSP should be rerouted away from this link (administrative/CLI) You can somewhat do some of these by changing metrics and waiting, but just was wondering if something more general might be useful. Also, with Diffserv TE, not sure that one can assume that a preemption necessarily "implies exhausted bandwidth at the affected priority level *and greater*" (section 5), but local implementations can do as they please I suppose. regards, Jim
|
|