The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Aug> msg00091



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Establishing E / L- LSPs with Bandwidth Reservation

  • From: Sasha Vainshtein <Sasha@AXERRA.com>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:33:05 +0200
  • Cc: mpls@UU.NET, flefauch@cisco.com, "'sumit singh'" <sumit_s@rediffmail.com>, rsvp@isi.edu

Sharam and all,
Please see inline.

With best regards,
                                   Sasha Vainshtein
email:     sasha@axerra.com <mailto:sasha@axerra.com> 
tel:       +972-3-7659993 (office)
           +972-8-9254948 (res.)
           +972-58-674833 (cell.)
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shahram Davari [mailto:Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:47 PM
> To: 'sumit singh'; rsvp@isi.edu
> Cc: mpls@UU.NET; flefauch@cisco.com
> Subject: RE: Establishing E / L- LSPs with Bandwidth Reservation 
... snipped ...
>  
> >If yes, then how should one decide from which of the corresponding 
> >PSCs' BW one should subtract the BW required for that E LSP?
> 
> You can't. But this mode should only be used when you don't need to
> differentiate between the BW of different PSCs in the E-LSP. 
> For example when the E-LSP carries AF1x and AF2x.
> 
I do not remember such a recommendation in RFC 3270 (did I miss it?), 
but it definitely looks like the right thing to do.
If it is really missing in 3270, it's a pity since this is quite an 
important issue.
>
> -Shahram
> 
> >
> >Please help me understand.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Sumit
> >
> >
> >___________________________________________________
> >Meet your old school or college friends from
> >1 Million + database...
> >Click here to reunite www.batchmates.com/rediff.asp
> >
> >
>