The MPLS WG Archive

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

>Alex> However, if a  discussion on a specific part of  the document has been
>Alex> triggered within the WG and the  consensus was to change the text, the
>Alex> editors need to do this.
>
>Sure.  One should  not ignore the WG consensus.  That point  is that that is
>not the same as saying you can't modify the document without first obtaining
>WG consensus.  The latter would  require that consensus be obtained on every
>revision, which I don't think has ever been part of the process.

         Or is reasonable given the number of changes sometimes
done to documents!  Anyway, the edited document is always fair
game after it is updated and published in the ID repository, and
will not proceed past WG last call unless there is consensus
on the document. So back to the original point, IMHO it does
seem as though Stewart is well within the letter of the law on
this one.

         --Tom



http://www.elsevier-international.com/catalogue/title.cfm?ISBN=155860751X