The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Apr> msg00075



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Document editors + consensus. [was: Re: Draft MPLS minutes]

  • From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 15:21:36 -0500
  • cc: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>, mpls@UU.NET
  • User-Agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3(Unebigoryōmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2(sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)


Alex> However, if a  discussion on a specific part of  the document has been
Alex> triggered within the WG and the  consensus was to change the text, the
Alex> editors need to do this. 

Sure.  One should  not ignore the WG consensus.  That point  is that that is
not the same as saying you can't modify the document without first obtaining
WG consensus.  The latter would  require that consensus be obtained on every
revision, which I don't think has ever been part of the process.