The MPLS WG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
Checking MPLS WG Consensus
-
From: "David Allan" <dallan@nortelnetworks.com>
-
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:23:17 -0500
Title: RE: Checking MPLS WG Consensus
George/Loa:
While I think an IETF requirements statement for OAM is useful, I'd like to understand better the relationship of pursuing this to both the current charter (where my experience is that OAM is out of scope, witness the BOF at IETF 51), and the decision last summer to effectively delegate OAM beyond ping and traceroute to the ITU-T SG13 via publishing RFC 3429.
What is to be the scope of MPLS WGs efforts in this space?
cheers
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Swallow [mailto:swallow@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:09 PM
> To: mpls@UU.NET
> Subject: Checking MPLS WG Consensus
>
>
> In San Francisco the workgroup showed support for making
>
> OAM Requirements for MPLS Networks
> draft-nadeau-ietf-oam-requirements-01.txt
>
> an MPLS WG Document. This message is to solicit any further
> comments prior to making a final determination.
>
> Please reply by 4/7 24:00 GMT.
>
> ...George
>
> ======================================================================
> George Swallow Cisco Systems (978) 936-1398
> 250 Apollo Drive
> Chelmsford, Ma 01824
>
>
>
>
|