The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Apr> msg00008



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Check MPLS WG Consensus (on nodeid-subobject)

  • From: "zafar ali" <zali@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:11:41 -0500
  • Importance: Normal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET] On Behalf 
> Of Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:24 AM
> To: mpls@UU.NET
> Subject: Re: Check MPLS WG Consensus (on nodeid-subobject)
> 
> 
> several points here, first i'd like to know how this 
> relates to the current polling of inter-area req's to 
> worked out in the scope of the tewg ? then i thought 
> that inter-area/inter-as solution development were 
> within the scope of the ccamp wg (just to be sure that 
> we also keep some consistence on the work is organised 
> within the sub-ip area)
> 

Hi Dimitri, 

I would just like to point out that the ID is applicable to an single
area TE case as well. This is for the cases where, either a box may like
to avoid peeking into IGP database to find the Merge Point address from
the interface addresses, or IGP is not used (a non-practical case). 

In addition, as the contents/ extension in the drafts are so minor, the
WG discussions at the IETF meeting went along the line of moving forward
with this as a more generic solution (which is not a 100% tied up with
the Inter-AS/ Inter-area discussions). 

Thanks

Regards... Zafar 

> now independently of the work organisation, this i-d
> is valuable when backup tunnels are used and i think 
> the following i-d "complements" the proposed solution 
> using detour lsp's for this real problem being "abr 
> node protection and as border node protection":
> 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-decnodder-mpls-interas-protect
ion-00.txt

thanks,
- dimitri.
 
> LE ROUX Jean-Louis FTRD/DAC/LAN wrote:
> 
> I agree for support of this draft
> 
> JL
> 
> >In San Francisco the workgroup showed support for making
> >   Definition of an RRO node-id subobject
> >     draft-vasseur-mpls-nodeid-subobject-00.txt
> >
> >an MPLS WG Document.  This message is to solicit any further comments
> 
> >prior to making a final determination.
> >
> >Please reply by 4/7 24:00 GMT.
> >
> >...George
> >
> >=====================================================================
> >=
> 
> >George Swallow          Cisco Systems                   (978)
> 936-1398
> >                         250 Apollo Drive
> >                         Chelmsford, Ma 01824

-- 
Papadimitriou Dimitri 
E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com
Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone  : +32 3 240-8491