The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Check MPLS WG Consensus (on nodeid-subobject)
several points here, first i'd like to know how this relates to the current polling of inter-area req's to worked out in the scope of the tewg ? then i thought that inter-area/inter-as solution development were within the scope of the ccamp wg (just to be sure that we also keep some consistence on the work is organised within the sub-ip area) now independently of the work organisation, this i-d is valuable when backup tunnels are used and i think the following i-d "complements" the proposed solution using detour lsp's for this real problem being "abr node protection and as border node protection": http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-decnodder-mpls-interas-protection-00.txt thanks, - dimitri. > LE ROUX Jean-Louis FTRD/DAC/LAN wrote: > > I agree for support of this draft > > JL > > >In San Francisco the workgroup showed support for making > > Definition of an RRO node-id subobject > > draft-vasseur-mpls-nodeid-subobject-00.txt > > > >an MPLS WG Document. This message is to solicit any further comments > > >prior to making a final determination. > > > >Please reply by 4/7 24:00 GMT. > > > >...George > > > >====================================================================== > > >George Swallow Cisco Systems (978) > 936-1398 > > 250 Apollo Drive > > Chelmsford, Ma 01824 -- Papadimitriou Dimitri E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/ Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium Phone : +32 3 240-8491
|
|