The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Sep> msg00087



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RSVP Refresh Reduction question

  • From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:04:54 -0400
  • cc: "'David Charlap'" <David.Charlap@marconi.com>, IETF MPLS List <mpls@UU.NET>, swallow@cisco.com

Reddy -

I don't like the idea of using the bit to mean "willing to receive".
For a properly compliant implementation, if you want to send then you
MUST set the bit and MUST be willing to receive.  If (for reasons that
I haven't imagined yet) you want to just receive, then just set the
bit and don't send.

As far as dealing with a *non-compliant* implementation, I completely
agree with Curtis.

...George

==================================================================
George Swallow       Cisco Systems                  (978) 497-8143
                     250 Apollo Drive
                     Chelmsford, Ma 01824