The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Sep> msg00051



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Clarification on Handling a specific event in LDP

  • From: "Vijayanand C - CTD, Chennai." <vijayc@ctd.hcltech.com>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:38:36 +0530
  • Cc: mpls@UU.NET

Kannan,
This is a special case.
 

 

I have a solution for this problem.

Basically if any LSR receives an Label withdraw message from its valid Next hop neighbor then before propagating to its upstream peers it need to check the value of the label being withdrawn, if the label happens to be an NULL label then it should not propagate the label withdraw to its upstream peers. Now this LSR should now assume itself as an egress for that LSP.
[Vijayanand C - CTD, Chennai.]  What will happen in valid cases when the eggress actually wants to withdraw label and when u no longer want to switch for that FEC ?The pennultimate hop should not hold the label in that case. How will the Phop know for which case the withdraw applies ?   

 

 

 

Second one could be there should be a provision to change the label for the particular FEC. I.e any point of time the valid next hop LSR can advertise a change of label for that FEC. Here problems are we need to maintain the context of that advertisement (LM).
[Vijayanand C - CTD, Chennai.]  This becomes unsolicited advertisement.

 

 

 

A better way would be for the egress to withdraw the label. However the ingress will not issue a request unless it is in Independent control. This anyway is a problem. My suggestin would be - The ingress after sending a release can issue a fresh request for the label even if its not in independent control if it still supports label switching on the FEC. I feel This would be more cleaner .

 

 

Vijay