The MPLS WG Archive

[Vishal M <vishal_study@yahoo.com>]

Hi Shahram,

Thanks for the clarification.

I re-read the relevant sections of RFC 3270 and have
some confusion trying to understand the concept of
Ordering Constraint and its usage.

How does an ingress LSR decide if there is any
ordering constraint between various packet flows it
receives. i.e. in Section 1.4 (last para), it says
that in order to preserve the ordering constraint, all
possible BAs of a given OA must be sent over same LSP.
This looks fine, but I have a doubt:

The question is:
How does an LSR decide if incoming packets of same
micro-flow have some ordering constraint? Where is
this info (of ordering constraint) carried?

Assuming an video-on-demand application running on a
host connected to an ingress LSR (doing MPLS DS TE).
This ingress LSR would receive both voice and video
packets (destined to different ports) on same
destination IP Address. Since its a video-on-demand
application, one would expect ordering constraint to
synchronize the video with voice contents.
Now can these video and voice packets be redirected to
different L-LSPs?

Could you/someone please clarify this?

thanks for your time,

regards,
Vishal.
PS: I'm not familiar with video/voice DSPs...the above
example just tries to provide an example of two
different classes (i.e. BAs) arriving at an ingress
LSR destined to same destination.

--- Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
wrote:
> The label in L-LSP represents only a single OA,
> while the label in E-LSP may represent:
> 
> - A single BA
> - A single OA
> - A number of BAs
> - A number of OAs
> - A number of BAs and OAs
> 
> " A set of BAs" is a generic term that applies to
> all the above cases.
> 
> -Shahram
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vishal M [mailto:vishal_study@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:35 PM
> > To: mpls@UU.NET
> > Subject: Ques on RFC 3270 (MPLS Support for
> DiffServ)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Question on RFC 3270 (MPLS Support for DiffServ),
> > Section 1.5:
> > 
> > The second paragraph explains about the
> relationship
> > between FEC and set of BAs...
> > 
> > Why don't we consider the concept of packet
> ordering
> > constaint (i.e. OA) for an E-LSP (say, E-LSP1 and
> > E-LSP2) ?
> > 
> > Assuming we have two E-LSPs from the same source
> (S)
> > to the same destination (D). Now if an incoming
> > multimedia packet stream from single source (of
> voice
> > and video traffic) is to be sent to destination
> (D),
> > is it possible to send voice traffic onto E-LSP1
> and
> > video onto E-LSP2 ? 
> > 
> > Why in this section, we have associated OAs with
> > L-LSPs only (and not with E-LSPs)?
> > 
> > Thanks for all the inputs and pointers,
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Vishal.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
> > http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
> > 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/