The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Comments for draft-vijay-mpls-rsvpte-lspsubobject-00.txt
Mani, The L bit processing would be no different from the normal processing in other subobjects. The ingress IP address in the LSP subobject is the address of consideration in this subobject.Anyway, to make it clear and explicit it can be incorporated in subsequent revisions. Regarding the sending of path message through the tunnel, I think this is more of an implementation issue. The ingress of the tunnel, which processes the LSP subobject, would identify that the path message should be transparently sent to the egress without creating path state in intermediate nodes.The tunnel which is like an IP interface, would be the outgoing interface for reaching the egress. I would add an explicit mention of this in subsequent revisions of the draft. Thanks and Regards, Vijay -----Original Message----- From: Manikantan Srinivasan [mailto:manis@futsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:55 PM To: Vijayanand C - CTD, Chennai. Cc: mpls@uu.net; David Charlap Subject: RE: Comments for draft-vijay-mpls-rsvpte-lspsubobject-00.txt Vijay > > 1) Regarding the L Bit - This could be set. For instance, if the previous > node of the tunnel ingress is not mentioned in the ERO then the > node before > that can still route the path message to the tunnel ingress looking at the > tunnel ingress address if the L bit is set. The ERO processing for the LSP subject needs clarification. Can this be added in your draft, how to process the ERO object in case of Strict ERO, Loose ERO etc., > > 2) Regarding the path message sent over the tunnel- I would say that the > path message would be sent over the existing tunnel as if it were an > interface, transparent to the intermediate nodes.It would not create path > state in the intermediate nodes. I did nt mention it explicitly though. Can this be explained as well. I am not sure to which FEC, this path message (data) will be mapped to? Because the initial tunnel/LSP is created for a specific FEC. Can this be added in your draft? best regards mani |
|