The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-04.txt
Hello Yuan, Yuan Gu wrote: > > I didn't receive any reply yet. Does anyone have any clue? > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of Yuan Gu > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:11 AM > To: mpls group > Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-04.txt > > Hi: > > I have two questions of MplsLSPID defined in this MIB: > > 1. It states in this MIB: > (MplsLSPId): "A unique identifier within an MPLS network that is assigned to > each LSP. This is assigned at the head end of the LSP and can be used by all > LSRs to identify this LSP...For LSPs signaled using RSVP-TE, the LSP ID is > defined as a 16-bit (2 byte) identifier used in the SENDER_TEMPLATE..." > My question is: How does a head end LSR assign a "MPLS network unique" LSPID > for a LSP in case the signaling is RSVP-TE? In RFC3209, it says: "The > SENDER_TEMPLATE object together with the session object uniquely identifies > an LSP tunnel." Does MplsLSPId definition conflict with RFC3209? The LSP ID portion of the Session object, does uniquely identify the specific Tunnel (see section 2.5 of that same spec). > > 2. A "mplsXCLspId" object is defined in XC table of LSR MIB while MplsLSPId > is only used for CR-LDP and RSVP-TE. My question is: In case of LDP, how do > we populate mplsXCLspID's value? I do not believe it is necessary to give this object a value for LDP. The conformance statement makes this object optional. -Joan > > Thanks for your reply! > > Yuan > IP Infusion > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of > Internet-Drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:26 AM > To: IETF-Announce: > Cc: mpls@UU.NET > Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-04.txt > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group > of the IETF. > > Title : Definitions of Textual for Multiprotocol Label > Switching (MPLS) Management > Author(s) : T. Nadeau et al. > Filename : draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-04.txt > Pages : 18 > Date : 2002-10-11 > > This memo describes Textual Conventions for use in definitions of > management information for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) > networks. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-04.txt > > To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message to > ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body of the message. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username > "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, > type "cd internet-drafts" and then > "get draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-04.txt". > > A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in > http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. > > Send a message to: > mailserv@ietf.org. > In the body type: > "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-04.txt". > > NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in > MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this > feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" > command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or > a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers > exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with > "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split > up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on > how to manipulate these messages. > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft.
|
|