The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] draft-vasseur-mpls-linknode-failure-00.txt
Hi Jean, I have question about Hello messages in RSVP-TE(RFC 3209). When exactly should the hello message be registered to timer. My thoughts: when RESVP is received on a node(LSR) and which confirms the success in creating the label.If this the right way then how this will be dealed at egress as it(egress) issues the first RESV and doesn't receieve as opposite to another nodes. Please advice me. Thanks, Nitin How --- Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi, > > New draft recently posted: > draft-vasseur-mpls-linknode-failure-00.txt. Any > comment is very welcome. > > Abstract > > The aim of this draft is to provide a method to > distinguish a link from > a node failure using RSVP hello extensions. In a > network making use of > MPLS Traffic Engineering Fast Reroute as specified > in [FAST-REROUTE], > efficient use can be made of the network links when > protecting against > link/node failures. As described in [FACILITY], > excess capacity used > for bypass tunnels can be shared between bypass > tunnels providing > protection for mutually exclusive failures of > different links or nodes. > This results in significant bandwidth savings under > the single failure > assumption. Making use of the single failure > assumption implies the > need to distinguish a link from a node failure. > However, the > mechanisms currently available for failures > detection do not always > allow to distinguishing a link from a node failure. > > Thanks. > > JP. > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
|
|