The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RFC 3036: Label Mapping Question
>Hi, > >I've one question on LDP. What should be the behaviour of the LDP module >when it receives the label mapping message for a FEC when the label >retention mode is liberal and that FEC (e.g. partial IP prefix) is not >visible to the local routing module? Should it store the label just >received >or send out label release message? "Should" store it >Here, the routing module just doesn't >have any information abt. this IP prefix. On querying, the routing module >returns "route not available" or "no information abt. the route". > >As per the LDP specs., it's implicit/apparent that label distribution >entities and routing entities should work in tandem and should remain in >synch. So, what should be the behaviour in this special case where LDP sees >some FEC but that FEC is not visible to routing entity? Before the Routing information could be propagated, the label mapping may be sent. This may be 'cos of a timing difference between the LDP and Routing entities [due to implementation behaviour]. The Routing entity may be able to send the routing information later [say in a time frame of a few seconds after the label mapping message] > >The following from RFC 3036, doesn't talk abt. this case explicitly: >LMp.12 Is MsgSource the Next Hop for FEC? If so, goto LMp.14. >Should the boolean expression in the step mentioned above be considered >"FALSE" in this specific scenario? >Any response will be greatly appreciated. >Thanks. >Prem > chetan _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx |
|