The MPLS WG Archive

[Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>]

Nabil,

> Yakov,
> 
> I suggest adding a section with title error handling - between
> section 6.2 and section 7. Having its own section is good as one
> would typically expect a note on error handling in this kind of
> a draft.  The section could indicate something  like:
> 
>  Section 7.0
>  -----------
>  "In order to indicate the interfaces on which a particular error
>   occured, a new IF_ID ERROR_SPEC object is defined. The definitions 
>   can be found in draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt and
>   draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt"
> 
> Also section 6.1 indicates that the LSR should return error.
> However, it does not specify whether the PathErr message
> will contain an existing error code or a new one to
> be defined by IANA. Could you clarify.

-05 version of the draft (just announced) addresses this.

Yakov.

> 
> ---
> Best, 
> Nabil Seddigh
> nseddigh@tropicnetworks.com
> 
> 
> > > 2. Also, if the unnum draft is not going to talk about error spec
> > >   it should reference the draft that defines the new
> > >   error_spec object for unnumbered links -
> > >   draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt
> > 
> > please tell me where would you like to insert the reference,
> > and I'll add it.
> > 
> > Yakov.
> >