The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] target ldp question:
The requirement for router("r" in below ase) between 2
targeted session peer is capable of mpls forwarding.
Question: in the case where R2 as the egress for FEC x
and R2 assigns label 0 as label binding for fec x on
its session with R1 ; now If transit LSR 'r'
forward the mpls frame(w/ label 0) to R1, does it
violate the RFC since RFC says LSR has to pop mpls
frame w/ label 0 ?
carlos
----
Jay Karthik wrote:
Yes, R2 will send out label mappings to R1,
provided the method of label
distribution is downstream unsolicited. (This is
regardless of whether R1
initially sends R2 the label mappings for the
corresponding FECs)
Jay
At 12:58 PM 6/21/02 -0700, Srikrishna Venkataraman
wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have a configuration as shown below:
>
>R1-----------R--------R2
>
>There is an extended session between R1 & R2.
>R2 learns of New routes from R1 through the middle
>router.
>Will R2 send out labels for the new routes to R1?
>
>
>thanks
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
|
|