The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Jul> msg00428



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[PWE3] Re: Secure MPLS

  • From: "h.hopkins" <h.hopkins@accent-on-networks.co.uk>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:44:02 +0100
  • Organization: Accent on Networks Ltd.
  • X-Scanner: exiscan *17ZctU-0003pR-00*vS71ccIk2r6* http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/

The Frame Relay Forum has published an Implementation Agreement on Privacy
at
http://www.frforum.com/5000/5000index.html See FRF.17 it may be relevant.

Harman H Hopkins
Director, Accent on Networks
26 Princes Road
Felixstowe, Suffolk
IP11 7QZ
UK

e-mail: h.hopkins@accent-on-networks.co.uk

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tissa Senevirathne" <tsenevir@hotmail.com>
To: <alan@routingloop.com>; <pwe3@ietf.org>; <mpls@UU.NET>;
<ppvpn@ppvpn.francetelecom.com>
Sent: 30 July 2002 19:09
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Re: Secure MPLS


> Alan
>
>   Can you give us pointers to secure Frame relay that we can use and
> compare..
>
>
> >From: Alan Hannan <alan@routingloop.com>
> >To: Tissa Senevirathne <tsenevir@hotmail.com>, pwe3@ietf.org,
mpls@UU.NET,
> >       ppvpn@ppvpn.francetelecom.com
> >Subject: [PWE3] Re: Secure MPLS
> >Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:27:02 -0700
> >
> >
> >   I suggest that folks review the work done on Secure Frame Relay.
> >
> >   -a
> >
> >Thus spake Ben Black (ben@layer8.net)
> >  on or about Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:49:16AM -0700:
> > > Could you elaborate further on the requirements for a secure MPLS
> > > mechanism?  Eager hackers seems a bit vague.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ben
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:02:36AM +0000, Tissa Senevirathne wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At Yokhoma during PWe3 session, it was indicated that hackers are
> >waiting
> > > > for the day that L2 VPN get exposed in the WAN.
> > > >
> > > > In light of that I thought to restart the discussion on Secure MPLS.
> > > >
> > > > The link below is Secure MPLS ID. This ID present how MPLS payloads
> >can be
> > > > encrypted in a similar manner like IPsec when upper layers does not
> >have
> > > > security capabilities. Or on links between PE to PE that are exposed
> >to
> > > > public networks.
> > > >
> > > > http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tsenevir-smpls-02.txt
> > > >
> > > > For those who are lot in to Security the DOI (Domain of
> >Interpretation) for
> > > > Secure MPLS can be found in
> > > >
> > > >
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tsenevir-smpls-doi-01.txt
> > > >
> > > > Could you provide comments and feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Tissa
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> > > > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >pwe3 mailing list
> >pwe3@ietf.org
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>