The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Jul> msg00388



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

initiating a discussion on mpls singaling protocols

  • From: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 08:14:55 -0700
  • Cc: mpls@UU.NET

Giles,

> 
> I want *both* mp2p LDP and targetted LDP.
> 
> I want the former because it:
> 
> 1) minimises the number of labels required in the core - O(N) rather
> than O(N squared).
> 

I think Heinrich Hummel demonstrated in the Japan (as predicted by Dave Allan)
that mp2p (LDP) results only ~15% less states than N^2 mesh. 

-Shahram