The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Jul> msg00384



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

AW: initiating a discussion on mpls singaling protocols

  • From: Hummel Heinrich <Heinrich.Hummel@icn.siemens.de>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 13:39:25 +0200
  • Cc: "'IETF MPLS List'" <mpls@UU.NET>

Let me try to give an answer myself w.r.t my previously asked question by this following

Table of current accomplishments:

 
                   CR-LDP,         RSVP-TE,       LDP
------------------------------------------------------
1) p2p     LSP       yes            yes           N/A 
2) p2mp    LSP        no             no           no (or N/A?)
3) mp2p    LSP        no             no           yes 
4) mp2mp   LSP        no             no           no (or N/A?)
5) p2p   H-LSP        no             no           N/A
6) mp2p  H-LSP        no             no           N/A
7) p2mp  H-LSP        no             no           no (or N/A?)
8) mp2mp H-LSP        no             no           no (or N/A?)  


I think we should take this table into consideration which may effect the ongoing CR-LDP versus RSVP-TE discussion
in one way or the other:

We may say: There are too many NO's as to make a pro/con CR-LDP decision already now.

And also: For economical reasons, let's turn only one NO into a YES   p e r   l i n e      - by future work.
 
Heinrich