The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Possible Conclusion to the Signaling debate?
Eric: As this more or less is all that has been suggested to date, I'm not sure how this qualifies as some minimal compromise that folks can agree to??? Modifying the November 01 milestone (intent to get stuff to draft standard) to only reference LDP, RSVP-TE and encapsulation IMHO would appear to be an achievable consensus. later Dave -----Original Message----- From: Gray, Eric [mailto:egray@celoxnetworks.com] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:55 AM To: mpls@UU.NET Subject: Possible Conclusion to the Signaling debate? Unsurprisingly, the debate rages on. I suspect that we might be able to achieve consensus to making the following change to the MPLS WG charter: Change - 2. Advance the Proposed Standards developed by the MPLS WG to Draft Standard. This includes the LDP, CR-LDP, and RSVP-TE signaling specifications as well as the encapsulations. To - 2. Advance the Proposed Standards developed by the MPLS WG to Draft Standard. This includes the LDP and RSVP-TE signaling specifications as well as the encapsulations. Ongoing work related to CR-LDP will be targeted for Informational status. It seems highly unlikely that we will get consensus to do much more than this at this point. Eric W. Gray Systems Architect Celox Networks, Inc. egray@celoxnetworks.com 508 305 7214 |
|