The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Jul> msg00314



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

initiating a discussion on mpls signaling protocols

  • From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:38:35 -0400
  • cc: MPLS wg <mpls@UU.NET>
  • User-Agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3(Unebigoryōmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2(sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)


[MG] If not, can we only have  one PWE3 protocol please, one IGP please, one
[MG] L2VPN discovery protocol please....


Certainly, let's drop all the IGPs that have zero deployment ;-)

In  the PWE3/PPVPN  context, if  we find  in a  few years  that some  of the
alternatives  have   zero  deployment,  we  should   consider  dropping  the
undeployed alternatives.