The MPLS WG Archive

[Robert Raszuk <raszuk@cisco.com>]

Hi Loa,

You can add my vote:

CRLDP experiment to be declared informational, RSVP-TE proceeds on
standards track. 

R.

> Loa Andersson wrote:
> 
> Heinrich,
> 
> in my opinion the question is very clearly stated - is there support for
> us (the ietf) to move the cr-ldp from standard track to informational.
> We're "speaking for the ietf", it is more a matter of what we say ;)
> 
> All,
> 
> As usual we are trying to reach a rough consensus. Everyone (i.e. the
> mpls wg) can help create this consensus by answering the question
> above.
> 
> Especially it will be helpful if you were involved in specifying the
> mpls protocols, have implemented or deployed (SP) those protocols, and
> take the time to respond.
> 
> I will be ready to give the first extensive tally mid this week.
> Currently the count is
> yes: 30 no: 7,
> if you normalize those e.g. by counting each company once it is
> yes: 21 no: 4
> 
> Disclaimer: Given that I've managed to decipher the sometimes cryptic
> mails correctly :o)
> 
> /Loa
> 
> Hummel Heinrich wrote:
> 
> >  I think, the IETF can only speak for itself. There may be other standardization
> 
> >bodies (ITU-T, MPLS Forum) which may fill
> > the gap.
> >
> > Heinrich Hummel
> > Siemens AG
> >
> 
> --
>      Loa Andersson
>      Chief Architect,
>      Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
>      Utfors AB
>      Råsundavägen 12
>      Box 525, 169 29 Solna
>      Office          +46 8 5270 2000
>      Office direct   +46 8 5270 5038
>      Mobile          +46 70 848 5038
>      Email           loa.andersson@utfors.se
>      WWW             www.utfors.se