The MPLS WG Archive

[Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be]

i definitely support the idea to progress rsvp-te on
the standard track and cr-ldp as informational only 

deployment reports (from the user community) can also 
help here (in addition, development report as delivered 
by the gmpls survey should also give a good orientation 
to the discussion)

- dimitri.

Loa Andersson wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> at the mpls wg meeting at the 54th IETF in Yokohama the issue of having
> two functional similar (not to say overlapping) protocols addressing
> the same functional space, as rsvp-te and cr-ldp were brought up.
> 
> The background is that when the signaling protocol for mpls traffic
> engineering and setting up explicit / constraint based routes were
> designed, there were two different approaches. One  based on rsvp and
> the other on ldp. It was not at that time possible to resolve the
> differences between the two approaches and this protocol duplication
> as been reflected in creation of sometimes functional duplicate
> specifications.
> 
> Since then both protocols has been progressed to proposed standard
> and implemented.
> 
> However, as has been shown in the survey on signaling protocols for
> GMPLS the implementations of rsvp-te far out number the cr-ldp
> implementations. As there are issues with having two similar standards
> (potentially diverging), and it generates duplicate work in several
> ietf working groups, the question was asked whether we should make
> cr-ldp informational (which still make it available and possible to
> work with) and progress only rsvp-te on the standards track.
> 
> At the meeting there were a wide spread support for this idea, but
> it was ruled that it was premature to call wg consensus on this at the
> meeting and that we wanted to take the discussion on the mpls mailing
> list.
> 
> This mail is to initiate this discussion. Please keep the discussion
> on the mpls list, do not cross post other lists. A separate mail to
> the ccamp, pwe3 and ppvpn has been sent to inform those wg's of this
> discussion.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> --
>      Loa Andersson
>      Chief Architect,
>      Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
>      Utfors AB
>      Råsundavägen 12
>      Box 525, 169 29 Solna
>      Office          +46 8 5270 2000
>      Office direct   +46 8 5270 5038
>      Mobile          +46 70 848 5038
>      Email           loa.andersson@utfors.se
>      WWW             www.utfors.se

-- 
Papadimitriou Dimitri 
E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone:   Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361