The MPLS WG Archive

[Loa Andersson <loa.andersson@utfors.se>]

Heinrich,

in my opinion the question is very clearly stated - is there support for
us (the ietf) to move the cr-ldp from standard track to informational.
We're "speaking for the ietf", it is more a matter of what we say ;)

All,

As usual we are trying to reach a rough consensus. Everyone (i.e. the
mpls wg) can help create this consensus by answering the question
above.

Especially it will be helpful if you were involved in specifying the
mpls protocols, have implemented or deployed (SP) those protocols, and
take the time to respond.

I will be ready to give the first extensive tally mid this week. 
Currently the count is
yes: 30 no: 7,
if you normalize those e.g. by counting each company once it is
yes: 21 no: 4

Disclaimer: Given that I've managed to decipher the sometimes cryptic
mails correctly :o)

/Loa

Hummel Heinrich wrote:

>  I think, the IETF can only speak for itself. There may be other standardization 

>bodies (ITU-T, MPLS Forum) which may fill 
> the gap.
> 
> Heinrich Hummel
> Siemens AG
> 


-- 
     Loa Andersson
     Chief Architect,
     Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
     Utfors AB
     Råsundavägen 12
     Box 525, 169 29 Solna
     Office          +46 8 5270 2000
     Office direct   +46 8 5270 5038
     Mobile          +46 70 848 5038
     Email           loa.andersson@utfors.se
     WWW             www.utfors.se