The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Jan> msg00112



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

FW: ERO question in RSVP-TE

  • From: "Feng, Mark" <m_feng@trillium.com>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:39:59 -0800

Sorry for the duplicate e-mail. It seems the first one got lost...

-----Original Message-----
From: Feng, Mark 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:56 PM
To: mpls@UU.NET
Subject: RE: ERO question in RSVP-TE


I have a similar question regarding the ERO processing:

"It is anticipated that new subobjects may be defined over time.  A
node which encounters an unrecognized subobject during its normal ERO
processing sends a PathErr with the error code "Routing Error" and
error value of "Bad Explicit Route Object" toward the sender.  The
EXPLICIT_ROUTE object is included, truncated (on the left) to the
offending subobject."

In the TE document, there is no definition for the PathErr message. Is it
true then, ERO object can appear in the PathErr message?

Thanks in advance.

- Mark