The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Jan> msg00060



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

One week last call on TC-MIB

  • From: "Cheenu Srinivasan" <cheenu@paramanet.com>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:10:16 -0500
  • Cc: <mpls@UU.NET>
  • Thread-index: AcGZFvL36XbdK0f8QVWOKjNY2LIJNAACIO+w
  • Thread-topic: One week last call on TC-MIB
  • X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by cell.onecall.net id KAA04954

> >In the Framework/Architecture an LSR is a Label Switching Router,
> >while in the set of MIBs (including the TC-MIB) it is a
> >Label Switch Router.
> 
>          I think that the collection of MIBs forms the management base
> for a standard LSR (i.e.: what is defined in the framework). So I
> don't understand your question. Are you  saying that the text
> for the MIBs states that the MIBs *are* the LSR?

I believe Loa is saying that the MIBs should define LSR to be "Label
Switching Router" rather than "Label Switch Router" as it is now.
We'll fix this. Thanks,

Cheenu