The MPLS WG Archive

["Don Fedyk" <dwfedyk@nortelnetworks.com>]

Title: RE: Last Call on LSP Feedback

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:afarrel@movaz.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:48 PM
> To: mpls@UU.NET
> Cc: George Swallow
> Subject: Re: Last Call on LSP Feedback
>
>
> Would it not be appropriate to change the name of this draft
> to include the fact
> that the protocol extensions defined apply to CR-LDP only? 
> This could also
> usefully be pointed out in the Abstract.

Yes True.

>
> Alternatively, perhaps it isn't too late to define the RSVP
> extensions.

Pointed out in the text. I think there is a requirement that
RSVP and CR-LDP be specified in separate documents otherwise
it is hard to quote RFC compliance. I would be willing to
do an RSVP equivalent document with a little help to make sure
I put the objects in the right place.

Don

>
> Adrian
> --
> Adrian Farrel
> Movaz Networks Inc.
> Tel: 703-847-1867
> afarrel@movaz.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Swallow" <swallow@cisco.com>
> To: <mpls@UU.NET>
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:12 AM
> Subject: Last Call on LSP Feedback
>
>
> > This message begins a two week WG last call on
> >
> >    Improving Topology Data Base Accuracy with LSP Feedback
> >
> >                 <draft-ietf-mpls-te-feed-03.txt>
> >
> > The last call closes Friday Jan 18, 2002 at 2400 GMT.
> >
> > ...George
> >
> >
> >
> ======================================================================
> > George Swallow          Cisco Systems                  
> (978) 497-8143
> >                         250 Apollo Drive
> >                         Chelmsford, Ma 01824
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>