The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Feb> msg00166



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

-04 version

  • From: Nabil Seddigh <nseddigh@tropicnetworks.com>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:33:57 -0500
  • CC: mpls@UU.NET
  • Organization: Tropic Networks

Yakov,

I suggest adding a section with title error handling - between
section 6.2 and section 7. Having its own section is good as one
would typically expect a note on error handling in this kind of
a draft.  The section could indicate something  like:

 Section 7.0
 -----------
 "In order to indicate the interfaces on which a particular error
  occured, a new IF_ID ERROR_SPEC object is defined. The definitions 
  can be found in draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt and
  draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt"

Also section 6.1 indicates that the LSR should return error.
However, it does not specify whether the PathErr message
will contain an existing error code or a new one to
be defined by IANA. Could you clarify.

---
Best, 
Nabil Seddigh
nseddigh@tropicnetworks.com


> > 2. Also, if the unnum draft is not going to talk about error spec
> >   it should reference the draft that defines the new
> >   error_spec object for unnumbered links -
> >   draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt
> 
> please tell me where would you like to insert the reference,
> and I'll add it.
> 
> Yakov.
>


  • References: