The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] -04 version
Yakov, I suggest adding a section with title error handling - between section 6.2 and section 7. Having its own section is good as one would typically expect a note on error handling in this kind of a draft. The section could indicate something like: Section 7.0 ----------- "In order to indicate the interfaces on which a particular error occured, a new IF_ID ERROR_SPEC object is defined. The definitions can be found in draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt and draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt" Also section 6.1 indicates that the LSR should return error. However, it does not specify whether the PathErr message will contain an existing error code or a new one to be defined by IANA. Could you clarify. --- Best, Nabil Seddigh nseddigh@tropicnetworks.com > > 2. Also, if the unnum draft is not going to talk about error spec > > it should reference the draft that defines the new > > error_spec object for unnumbered links - > > draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt > > please tell me where would you like to insert the reference, > and I'll add it. > > Yakov. >
|
|