The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Last calls on Hierarchy, Bundle, and Unnum
Jonathan, > > From: Yakov Rekhter [mailto:yakov@juniper.net] > > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 5:19 PM > > To: Nabil Seddigh > > Cc: mpls@UU.NET; Kireeti Kompella; Yakov Rekhter > > Subject: Re: Last calls on Hierarchy, Bundle, and Unnum > > > > > > Nabil, > > > > > I have just had a look at the 03 version of the unnumbered links > > > draft. Seems like I missed last call so maybe this is too > > late but... > > > I have a few suggestions in relation to the draft: > > > > > > 1. It would be nice if a new ERROR_SPEC c-type is defined for > > > unnumbered links. This ERROR_SPEC could indicate the node > > > and interface where an error occured. e.g in the case of > > > admission control failure. In a number of > > > current RSVP implementations for numbered networks, the > > > ip address of the interface where failure occured is inserted > > > into the ERROR_SPEC. It would be nice to have similar information > > > for in the unnumbered case. One would then know the exact > > > link where the failure occured. > > > > ok. > > > Section 8.2 of draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt talks about > Errored Interface Identification, but only defines formats for IPv4 and > IPv6. If needed, this could be extended to address unnumbered. However, > I'm not sure it's needed. You can already identify the Node with IPv4 or > IPv6 addresses. You can get the unnumbered interface from the ERO. Good point. Yakov.
|
|