The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Feb> msg00122



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Unnumbered links in non-GMPLS scenario

  • From: Nabil Seddigh <nseddigh@tropicnetworks.com>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:58:45 -0500
  • CC: "'senthil_v@lycos.com'" <senthil_v@lycos.com>, "'Yakov Rekhter'" <yakov@juniper.net>, szymanska_anna@poczta.onet.pl, mpls@UU.NET
  • Organization: Tropic Networks

Probably that should be:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-01.txt

Best,
Nabil



> 
>   You may want to look at:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-0
> 4.txt
>   Sub TLV types 11 and 12.
> 
>         Specifically, when an LSR advertises an unnumbered TE link,
>       the advertisement carries both the local and the remote
>       identifiers of the link.  If the LSR doesn't know the remote
>       identifier of that link, the LSR should use a value of 0 as
>       the remote identifier.